A recent comment from my last post:
"The new UAP study is promoting the Nuke-UFO hoaxes again! Where's James Carlson and Tim Hebert when we need them? Your research is hardly known at all while the military disinfo lies are now accepted as "rock hard" truth on the interwebs. Ah the religious fantasies.."
Not quite understanding the last sentence. Upset that I threw out a couple of verses from Esiah for a little uplifting for the Christmas holidays?
Can't say about James Carlson, but I believe that I said/wrote my peace regarding my opinions concerning UFO and nukes, ie nuclear weapons. Nothing has changed on that front.
I get the angst regarding the UAP study, but personally I left that subject for those that have the time and energy to tackle it. Robert Scheaffer at Bad UFOs has been doing a great job covering the subject.
My meager personal thought is that by substituting the term UAP for UFO the government is using this as a pretext to look into technology being used by foreign government interests as well as organized criminal elements. Yet they may very well be interested in UFOs of olden times complete with the ET trimmings.
In short, I really don't know. I tend to look at the reality that I am confronted with on a daily basis. I'm more concerned with state and federal governmental overreach that has been on display for the past two years. Personal freedom is more important to me than government agencies feigning to be looking into UFOs/UAPs.
"Your research is hardly known" Well, I did my best, but there is good news on that front. The viewership of the blog has been very positive. I don't post as frequently as I used to but that has not stopped people from viewing my work.
Currently total views is 242,000. For the past 6 months I've averaged well over 6000 views, that's 1000 per month. Again, not bad for a site that I've basically left up for those interested in looking at my past work, research and humble conclusions. One can take from it what one will...free to disagree if one wants. All that I ever asked was that my work be given due consideration.
Let's look at the last three months of activity on this blog:
Did UFOs Disable Minute Man Missiles at Malmstrom AFB in 1967...32 views and a total of 12.900 views since published back in Nov 2010.
Oscar Flight...36 views with overall views of 959.
2010 FE Warren posts...14 views...grand total of 897 views.
UFO ICBM/Nuke Connection: Does it Really Exist...9 views.
Thats just for the last three months regarding core UFO and Nukes blog posts. This does not touch on the numerous supporting posts for various principals involved in the numerous cases.
The total of the late David Schuur Minot AFB UFO encounter has been viewed separately 1.85K times. Again, this being another post going back to 2010.
"Did It Really Happen" has been cited in numerous blog and web sites. Some supportive, some not so. My theories and conclusions have been circulating...what more can I do?
James Carlson and I did an interview with NY Post reporter Steven Greenstreet back in November 2021 regarding Echo, Oscar and other related UFO and nukes stories. As of yet, no release of the interviews on his pod cast. Why so long? I've no answer to that question.
So, my work is still be looked at. My current views have not changed, but that can happen if new details emerge in the future. One current theme being circulating about the internet asks the question...do past UFO cases offer any real tangible answers to the reality of UFOs. UAPs is a different animal...its malleable, it can be beaten into any shape or form based on today's current technology.
Tim Hebert
