Or, has the story simply gone underground?
Nick Redfern posted an interesting article detailing a possible link with the Rays and Silas Newton. Most should be aware that the Aztec, NM UFO story is built on the foundation that back in 1948, a group of geologist had stumbled upon a secretive government clean-up operation involving a crashed UFO saucer.
Per Redfern, Rich Reynolds has come across possible documentation that ties Hilda Ray to Silas Newton concerning a legal case back in 1946. Hilda Ray was a practicing attorney back then. Reynolds was in the process of sorting out more detail and sourcing at this time, again as stated by Nick Redfern.
A recent update on Reynold's blog better explains the issue of the document and the lack of obtaining proper and second sourcing, thus the document will probably not be disclosed until the above happens. [This is the proper way and as it should be.]
http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-hoaxed-document.html
Further, Nick Redfern alludes to the possibilities that Ray, being a geologist, was either recruited or invited by the government to discern if the dead "aliens" where of a possible subterranean origin.
Nick Redfern's site and blog article:
http://nickredfernfortean.blogspot.com/2015/03/too-hasty-on-roswell-slides.html
An interesting theory, but it appears to be weakened by other factors pertaining to both the Aztec and Roswell stories.
The Roswell story is built on the foundation that a UFO/saucer had crashed and it's debris collected by the military, ergo it descended from space.
The Aztec UFO story is built on the foundation that a group of geologist had stumbled upon a government clean up operation of a crashed saucer, with dead aliens. This happening in 1948...supposedly.
The loose theory being proffered is that the government had retained(?) the services of Ray, Newton, et al, to determine if the aliens had originated as a subterranean-type of origin.
The two alleged incidents happening approximately 1 year apart. Why would the government be interested in subterranean origins when they would have had "tangible" proof via "saucer" debris which had been confiscated and secreted back to Wright-Patterson?
If we go by the prevailing premise that Bernerd Ray had opportunity and means of photoing dead "aliens" after either stumbling across the operation, or invited to render a professional opinion concerning species origin, there are absurdities with both versions.
1. The alien photos (Dew, Carey, Schmitt) show something in a glass display case/container which would mean no photos were taken at the scene of the alleged crash...Roswell and/or Aztec, thus hardly proving that Bernerd Ray had happened across a crash clean up site.
2. Ray was a geologist, not a biologist or forensic pathologist, so his input would have been professionally worthless as far as examining the dead aliens and establishing origin.
This story defies logic...regardless of any so-called government attempt to use Aztec as a cover for Roswell.
Here is Rich Reynold's theory of Aztec as a cover for Roswell posted back in 2013:
http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2013/05/aztec-is-really-roswell.html
Not surprising is that the current interest in the "Roswell" Kodachrome slides and their alleged link to Bernard/Hilda Ray have also sparked an interest in the Aztec story. One of the issues, as I see it, is the task of actually linking the slides to the Rays. Right now, it appears to be a mere correlation without proof.
Here is Paul Kimball's thoughts regarding the prospect that Hilda Ray may/or may not have represented Silas Newton in a case back in 1946:
http://redstarfilms.blogspot.ca/2015/03/jumping-to-conclusions.html
We'll all await May 5th and further await Rich Reynold's release of his documents should he obtain the proper sourcing.
Here is Rich Reynold's theory of Aztec as a cover for Roswell posted back in 2013:
http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2013/05/aztec-is-really-roswell.html
Not surprising is that the current interest in the "Roswell" Kodachrome slides and their alleged link to Bernard/Hilda Ray have also sparked an interest in the Aztec story. One of the issues, as I see it, is the task of actually linking the slides to the Rays. Right now, it appears to be a mere correlation without proof.
Here is Paul Kimball's thoughts regarding the prospect that Hilda Ray may/or may not have represented Silas Newton in a case back in 1946:
http://redstarfilms.blogspot.ca/2015/03/jumping-to-conclusions.html
We'll all await May 5th and further await Rich Reynold's release of his documents should he obtain the proper sourcing.