tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7811150598222033655.post7641979507595096076..comments2024-03-09T00:22:04.859-08:00Comments on Did It Really Happen?: Minot AFB UFO Incident 1968: Ground Observations by Missile Maintenance Team Part 2Tim Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04816425882305963295noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7811150598222033655.post-10893260455758983982014-03-09T13:10:27.372-07:002014-03-09T13:10:27.372-07:00Hey Tom,
I believe that Smith's AF-117 is jus...Hey Tom,<br /><br />I believe that Smith's AF-117 is just as relevant as the others. I merely based my initial order of review simply based on the time lines stated in other documents, ie WSC log and Werlich's initial phone report to Lt Marano. I certainly don't won't to leave the impression that Smith's observation is not germane to the incident, to the contrary, I find Smith's inputs very interesting on various levels.<br /><br />Again, my intent is to dedicate a separate blog post to Smith, both AF-117 and the content of your interview.<br /><br />Since I tend to do these things in a serial fashion (multi-parts), I may have given you and others the impression that I've omitted or have no intention of covering certain facets of the case...I can assure you and others that its not my intention to do so. <br /><br />TimTim Heberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04816425882305963295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7811150598222033655.post-58881757088804304712014-03-09T12:51:54.897-07:002014-03-09T12:51:54.897-07:00Hi Tim:
If you feel that information in Smith'...Hi Tim:<br /><br />If you feel that information in Smith's AF-117 is misconstrued or inaccurate in some way perhaps it needs to be addressed since it impacts any hypotheses that you may be considering. I am not challenging you on this point, but would be interested to understand why you personally feel that this information is unimportant to a reconstruction of a timeline based on the documentation. Also note that Smith's statement "I was notified it had been seen in an adjacent area. I alerted my [sentries]" implies that his sentries were not the original source of the report, suggesting that the UFO was in the area prior to 2:15.<br /><br />TomTom T.http://www.minotb52ufo.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7811150598222033655.post-33687750882955120562014-03-09T00:58:01.045-08:002014-03-09T00:58:01.045-08:00Tom,
Thanks for your comment. I'm working on...Tom,<br /><br />Thanks for your comment. I'm working on the next posting that details the November Flight security teams' observations. After that, I'll talk about William Smith's observations and O-6 and O-7 respectively.<br /><br />I guess that I could have started off with Smith, but personally felt that the time lines fell somewhat more with the Mnx team and November Flight. Despite that, I've no problem if one wanted to say that Smith, based on his AF-117, should have been mentioned first as having the initial observation, and I did mention him first with the idea of setting the stage in a separate blog posting.<br /><br />By all means, I hope that my links to your site, minotb55ufo.com, provides readers the rest of the information concerning this UFO case.<br /><br />Kind regards,<br /><br />TimTim Heberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04816425882305963295noreply@blogger.com